Private markets
Defense & Autonomy · Counter-Drone Systems

Epirus

Develops high-power microwave systems designed to counter electronic threats and drones.

Research status
Research coverage
Headquarters
Torrance, CA
Coverage
2 product lines mapped
Last reviewed
September 2026
Product map

What the company builds

Products and operating platforms help connect company-level news to the revenue pools, customers, competitors, and supply chains it may affect.

01

Leonidas

Software-defined high-power microwave counter-electronics system.

02

Leonidas Pod

Compact form factor for airborne integration.

01 / THE BUSINESS

How Epirus creates value.

Develops high-power microwave systems designed to counter electronic threats and drones. The research focus is whether customer adoption can support attractive economics after development, delivery and ongoing service costs.

SectorAerospace & defense
Founder coverage1 profile
Research checkedSep 18, 2026

02 / PEOPLE BEHIND THE COMPANY

Meet the builders.

Co-founder

Bo Marr

Bo Marr is a co-founder of Epirus. The company’s founding and leadership material provides context for its work in counter-drone systems.

Explore founder

Selected founders; historical founding roles are distinct from current management positions.

03 / CAPITAL & OWNERSHIP

Follow the financing.

Selected disclosed events, newest first. Announcement values describe that transaction and date; they are not current share prices. Debt, equity and secondary transactions are identified separately.

  1. Equity

    Series D

    Disclosed amount$250M
    Not disclosedNot disclosed

    Named participants: 8VC · Washington Harbour Partners · StepStone Group · T. Rowe Price Investment Management · Gaingels · General Dynamics Land Systems · NightDragon · Manhattan Venture Partners

    Selected named participants from the original release.

    Read the announcement

Explore the named investors.

Names refer to the cited transactions. They do not establish current ownership, ownership percentages, or endorsement of this website.

04 / IN THEIR OWN WORDS

Watch. Listen. Form your view.

Interviews reflect the speaker’s perspective at publication. Company statements are not independent verification.

05 / EDITORIAL ANALYSIS

The opportunity. The open questions.

Our interpretation of the business model and cited sources, not a valuation or a recommendation.

What could work

The case to investigate

  • Demand for scalable defenses against low-cost autonomous threats.
  • A stronger product position becomes economically meaningful when customers renew, expand and pay enough to cover delivery costs.
What could go wrong

Pressure-test the thesis

  • Procurement cycles.
  • Technology alternatives.
  • Customer concentration.

What to watch next

01

Field testing — what changed in the latest original disclosure?

02

Program selection — what changed in the latest original disclosure?

03

System production — what changed in the latest original disclosure?

YOUR RESEARCH WORKSPACE

Keep the questions that matter.

Use this checklist to record what you have investigated. Your notes stay in this browser.

06 / RESEARCH TRAIL

Go straight to the source.

Research checked Sep 18, 2026. Selected public disclosures, not a complete capitalization table or securities-filing search. Missing information is left unconfirmed. No investment availability or IPO date is implied.

Why SMYC is watching

Demand for scalable defenses against low-cost autonomous threats.

Private-company information is incomplete, episodic, and difficult to verify. Treat every data point as a starting point for diligence—not a substitute for company-approved materials, legal review, or investment analysis.

Add to my private current

Signals to monitor

Field testingProgram selectionSystem production

Risks to underwrite

Procurement cyclesTechnology alternativesCustomer concentration
Underwriting map

What an investor should actually diligence

Separate prototypes, funded development, production awards, and recurring software or sustainment. Contract ceilings are not revenue; production capacity and program-of-record status drive durability.

Buyer map

01

U.S. Department of Defense

02

Allied defense ministries

03

Prime contractors

04

Critical-infrastructure operators

Economics to request

01

Funded backlog versus contract ceiling

02

Program and customer concentration

03

Hardware gross margin at rate production

04

Working-capital and facility requirements

05

Software, service, and sustainment mix

Moat tests

01

Systems perform in operational conditions

02

Production scales without quality erosion

03

Open architecture wins repeat integrations

04

Procurement relationships convert into repeat programs

Milestone map

01

Operational deployment

02

Production contract

03

Facility and throughput expansion

04

New program or allied customer

Comparable lensesDefense primesAutonomous systemsMission softwareSpecialized sensors and effectors
Underwriting framework

How to diligence Epirus

A company-specific starting point based on the operating realities of defense & autonomy. Replace assumptions with verified company materials, customer evidence, legal documents, and expert work.

Economics to model
01

Funded backlog versus total ceiling

02

Prototype-to-production conversion

03

Unit economics at production rate

04

Customer and program concentration

Evidence of proof
01

Operational deployment

02

Program-of-record status

03

Repeat orders and allied adoption

04

Production capacity with qualified suppliers

Comparable lenses
01

Defense primes

02

Specialized electronics providers

03

Uncrewed-system manufacturers

04

Government software platforms

Questions to answer
01

Can the company survive procurement timing?

02

What remains human-controlled?

03

Which export restrictions limit the market?

04

Does autonomy work in contested conditions?

No securities are offered here.

SMYC does not represent that shares are available, transferable, appropriately priced, or suitable for any person. Private securities are illiquid, speculative, subject to transfer restrictions, and may result in total loss.