Question quality
Narrow prompts around an evidence test, not a vague request to find good stocks.
Search public and private companies, people, funds, markets, tools, and research.
Configure companies, questions, evidence lanes, and preferred cadence. Run a live multi-company scan and preserve each result in your private research history.
Create the first monitor to turn a watchlist into a repeatable process.
Run an agent once and its evidence snapshot will appear here for comparison.
A strong research agent repeats a bounded question, preserves sources, exposes uncertainty, compares changes over time, and hands judgment back to the member.
Narrow prompts around an evidence test, not a vague request to find good stocks.
Track which primary and secondary sources were checked, unavailable, or stale.
Prioritize what changed since the last run instead of rewriting the entire company.
Every finding should connect to a thesis assumption, risk limit, or follow-up action.
Fluent language can hide missing sources, entity errors, or unsupported causality.
Broad agents accumulate irrelevant findings and become difficult to verify.
Without run history, the research process cannot show what changed or why.
Write the exact assumption the agent is testing.
Specify acceptable evidence, freshness, exclusions, and failure behavior.
Preserve direct links, dates, excerpts, and entity identifiers.
Review the evidence and countercase before changing a decision.